IGGG M is long overdue

Appeal to YDP Agong on GE13 From: Joshua Y. C. Kong, P. O. Box 11923, 88821 Kota Kinabalu, Sabah. 088 247823 DYMM YDP Agong 24th June, 2013 Istana Negara, Kuala Lumpur. Greetings from Sabah, Daulat Tuanku. Ampun Tuanku, This appeal is to the DYMM YDP Agong only, thank you. Re: General Elections 2013 and formation of Government As a whistleblow for the nation especially for Sabah, I have a burden for all after the General elections 2013 had been fixed yet again by the Election Commission Malaysia (ECM) as in GE2004 and GE2008. The evidence of the rigged GE13 is everywhere and also in the many Courts cases now filed. 2. Just to mention to you Ampun Tuanku, I am to list three very important items to confirm the rigged GE13 known to the Election Commission Malaysia as follows:- 2.1. The official main Gazette of 22nd May, 2013 together with the subsequent -corrigendum - Gazette of 31st May, 2013 confirm the GE13 as null, void and illegal as the Form 16 cannot be amended by anyone. The official main Gazette did not comply with the Form 16 as there was a missing item like the ‘referee’ not playing by own rules. 2.2. The indelible ink was easily washed within minutes meaning ECM designed it for cheating. 2.3. The ECM only demanded the aggrieved parties to lodge Police Reports and nothing is followed up by ECM or the relevant authorities such as the PDRM, MACC, Judiciary have failed the nation. 3. To speak a simple language - the ECM is caught again with pent down in cheating. 4. So Ampun Tuanku, please do the following immediately - 4.1. As ECM is appointed by you, ECM’s Commissioners should be removed and replaced with new independent commissioners. 4.2 Suspend the present illegitimate Government and instal an Interim Good Governance Government (IGGG).. Yang benar, Joshua Y. C. Kong 6013-8394513 Http://ballotboxgroup.blogspot.com

Fresh air for IGGG M

Malaysia was a scam ab initio… That is the reality..since the Proclamation of Malaysia..on 16 September, 1963, a departure from what had been observed and done since Malaysia was announced by Tunku Abdul Rahman since early 1962. We had the 18/20 points of Sarawak and Sabah now in the “dustbin” of the conqueror not equal partners. We had the Cobbold Commission and IGC Report which had been sidelined by the conqueror. What some rapists are saying is that Parliament can change the MA63 and the original intention thereof by amending whatever abuses of the conqueror could do like now rapists are marrying the very young victims after raping with or without consent. The International Agreement aka Malaysia Agreement 1963 signed by 5 parties on 9th July, 1963 and the 5 parties were UK, Malaya, Singapore, Sabah and Sarawak especially when Sabah and Sarawak lacks legal standing to sign the said agreement as British Colonies. What are the views of the legally uneven yoked partners? The reality as diluted is Malaysia is 5, 4 or 13 or 14, 15 partners expanded by fanciful desires of the conqueror? Look at how any Agreement is made especially MA63 when 5 parties were fully involved. Did Tunku represent Malaya as a solitary body or did he represent 11 other states of Malaya? Was he empowered to negotiate for 11 states of Malaya? Where is the consent document from all the 11 States? Why Kelantan objected to Malaysia on 11 September, 1963? Did that objection divert the mind of Tunku in his original intention of Malaysia of 5, 4 or 3? What did Tunku say in 1962? So the reality of any Agreement in any partnership is that all the partners should come together in any meeting but no so in Malaysia Agreement 63. Whatever documents including Parliament amendment especially in 1976 are all after thought of the conqueror making Malaysia a scam ab initio. So we must now deal with this deformity of Malaysia and resolve or dissolve it in the most appropriate manner without fail. IGGG M is the beginning of the fresh effort of fresh air in this tragedy. Joshua Kong, PM of IGGG M. On 11 September 1963, just 4 days before the new Federation of Malaysia was to come into being, the Government of the State of Kelantan sought a declaration that the Malaysia Agreement and Malaysia Act were nulfive parties l and void, or alternatively, that even if they were valid, they did not bind the State of Kelantan. The Kelantan Government argued that both the Malaysia Agreement and the Malaysia Act were not binding on Kelantan on the following grounds that the Malaysia Act in effect abolished the Federation of Malaya and this was contrary to the 1957 Federation of Malaya Agreement that the proposed changes required the consent of each of the constituent states of the Federation of Malaya – including Kelantan – and this had not been obtained. Proclamation of Malaysia (start of PoM) WHEREAS by an Agreement made on the Ninth day of July in the year one thousand nine hundred and sixty-three between the Federation of Malaya, the United Kingdom, North Borneo, Sarawak and Singapore it was agreed that there shall be federated the States of Sabah, Sarawak and Singapore with the Federation of Malaya comprising the states of Pahang, Trengganu, Kedah, Johore, Negri Sembilan, Kelantan, Selangor, Perak, Perlis, Penang[1] and Malacca, and that the Federation shall thereafter be called "MALAYSIA": (end of PoM) MALAYSIA comprising the States of Pahang, Trengganu, Kedah, Johore, Negri Sembilan, Kelantan, Selangor, Perak, Perlis, Penang,[1] Malacca, Singapore, Sabah and Sarawak shall by the Grace of God, the Lord of the Universe, forever be an independent and sovereign democratic State founded upon liberty and justice, ever seeking to defend and uphold peace and harmony among its people and to perpetuate peace among nations. Any hidden agenda??

USD550trillion derivatives collapse

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l42AIhUz2_o Survive economic collapse of USD550trillions in derivatives..

Joshua of IGGG M is the man God is looking to save Malaysia.

https://www.facebook.com/alexymleow/videos/vb.639436080/10153621152131081/?type=2&theater IGGG M is the righteous Gvoernment..

why I do the same since 2004

http://www.malaysiakini.com/news/350371 Constitutional law expert Abdul Aziz Bari is currently under investigation for urging the Yang di-Pertuan Agong and the Conference of Rulers to take action following the US Department of Justice's (DOJ) 1MDB-related lawsuits. His family accompanied him early this morning as he gave his statement at the Bukit Aman police headquarters. Read more: https://www.malaysiakini.com/news/350371#ixzz4FnTrN7eV

Pencuri="perdana menteri" in Malaysia

pencuri="perdana Menteri" is not a joke but reality as all PMs steal. Tungku steals a lot through Tun Mustapha in timber ill gotten gains.. Razak stole our oil and gas by emergency power. Hussein reap the thefts of others.. Mahathir admitted "stealing" in many words and in many ways.. Badawi via USD50b loan of Asasatu Technology Sdn. Bhd. Oh Najib - MO1, "perdana menteri" not a joke...

No need demonstration ...

no need demonstration but ask DYMM YDP Agung instal IGGG M now. http://fresh-air-in-iggg.blogspot.my/ Fresh-Air in IGGG Msia fresh-air-in-iggg.blogspot.com If demonstration is held, the yellow, the red, orange, green and black may come out to clash and give Najib the chance to order NSC. Priorities of IGGG M:- 1. clean up the electoral rolls of Project IC holders; 2. clean up corruption, 3. clean up the bad images of BN/UMNO for 58 years; 4. clean up the education systems run by fake degrees holders, 5. clean up the fake money under Bank Negara, 6. clean up the Judiciary, 7. upgrade the security in the nation, 8. help the poor to have a new life, 9. set the captives in slavery free, 10. no more dramas of evil, 11. be progressive in all matters.

Jesus Christ can save Malaysia

http://yapsdiet.com/mystory/music/OneDayAtATime.128.mp3

IGGG M to resolve or dissolve Malaysia after 52 years

The substance of the Spirit of Malaysia says it all with clarity Since Minister in the Prime Minister's Department Nancy Shukri wants to see the evidence on any non-compliance with the Malaysia Agreement 1963 and intergovernmental committee (IGC) report.[ Provide proof of breach first DE 19 September, 2015], I would like to respond as these long standing issues of 52 years need to be resolved promptly as this has impacted everyone in Malaysia especially Sabah and Sarawak as we need to re-make Malaysia from 16 September 2015 or otherwise following the Prime Minister signing the Malaysia Commemorative Book in Kota Kinabalu’s Merdeka Padang witnessed by the TYT of Sabah followed by the raising of the Jalur Gemilang signifying a fresh start of promises affirmed or otherwise. It was in the same place that the Proclamation of Malaysia was done 52 years ago. Was the Spirit of Malaysia seriously bruised or dented so much so that an affirmative action (possibly questioned) was done symbolically by the signing of the Commemorative Book after 52 years? What was the intention from August 1961, when it was first announcement by the founding Father Tunku Abdul Rahman when it was meant to be five in the proposed family of Malaysia and then the action was first pursued by the Malaysia Solidarity Consultative Committee (MSCC). Going through the various ideas and comments floating in recent years, it is likely that “Malaysia” is a red herring confirming all the breaches done ab initio. The Spirit of Malaysia at the formative years namely 1961- early1963 was at grave variance as soon as the Proclamation of Malaysia was declared on 16 September, 1963. Then we had the Malaysia Agreement 1963 where Emeritius Professor Datuk Dr. Salem Shad Faruqi said Malaysia Agreement is not an internal arrangement but international one and he said at the presentation of paper entitled “Constitutional Issues in Federal-State Relations’ at the Malaysia Federalism and the Way Forward closed door discussion organised by the Society Empowerment and Economic Development Sabah (SEEDS). It was to note that in the Proclamation of Malaysia on 16 September, 1963, Sabah, Sarawak and Singapore were still British colonies and not nations/parties to commit in International agreement. Was this a serious legal breach as null and void and no effect? If you study the Proclamation of Malaysia carefully, the first paragraph started with four partners(states)/nations and then ended with sort of vagueness to include other 11 states in the Federation of Malaya. Quote: “MALAYSIA comprising the States of Pahang, Trengganu, Kedah, Johore, Negri Sembilan, Kelantan, Selangor, Perak, Perlis, Penang,[1] Malacca, Singapore, Sabah and Sarawak shall by the Grace of God, ….” Was that the true Spirit of Malaysia from the start? Can we treat the Proclamation of Malaysia as sort of sabotage of the movement? We could see the form and substance in conflict precipitating great injustice as soon as Malaysia came into existence. This article would illustrate some of items of injustice or even a scam of sort. While another headline titled “ Now the moment for Sabah” by Tan Sri Chong Kah Kiat at the same forum of SEEDS could encourage Sabahans to proceed further except to face the possibility of Sedition Act 1948 as amended or the section in penal code of 124 in the context of Parliament democracy. So to avoid such untenable and undesirable scenario occurring it is best that Cabinet bring this malaise of Malaysia as too many breaches right from the beginning to the Parliament’s next sitting after 52 years and forthwith go forward promptly to do the needfuls. Now after 52 years, it is likened that we need to call up those early leaders (some still living) and the spirits of those who had passed on to re-create the substance of the Spirit of Malaysia. Nevertheless, their spirits may not be visible amongst us but the spirit of the words in the formation of Malaysia and the implementation of Malaysia are very much with us as we can now see more books to be published to state the strong case of the Spirit of Malaysia. Dr. Salem went to say that “Even the words used by Prime Minister Datuk Seri Najib Tun Razak such as devolution and empowerment are inaccurate.” So in this context, we really need the appropriate action and performance accordingly to the original concept of Malaysia. So is this substance and its spirit emerging to clear all the doubts of 52 years? The other intention for Sabah, Sarawak and Singapore was the de-colonisation of the British Empire after the World War 2 which was possibly good but premature for Sabah and Sarawak as it was Brunei still a colony till 1984. So was this process of true independence followed through by the British and Malaya? Was United Nations Resolution No. 1541 principle 1X complied with? Was this a breach of sort in the international context? Was there a hidden agenda of sort wounding the Spirit of Malaysia as UN was also sort of helplessness or party to sort of “scam” emerging? Would UN now assess its own failing in the formation of Malaysia? There was the Malaysia Agreement 1963 signed on 9th July, 1963 but like all Agreements subject to breaches when the parties signing that Agreement could be influenced by whatever persuasions especially we were told by some of those who were involved then. This MA63 was obviously breached or even null and void and ineffective or unenforceable since the beginning with the Proclamation of Malaysia especially with the forced departure of Singapore on 7th August, 1965, and on 9th August, 1965, Singapore became a new nation. As we all known it is difficult to enforce any Agreement if there is a dominant party or parties. So likewise MA 63 was supported by a Malaysia Act 1963 passed in the UK Parliament. Was a similar Malaysia Act 1963 passed in the Malaya Parliament? Would it be any difference if an Act of the parliament is violated unlike an agreement? I leave this to learned legal scholars to tell us now. Another ongoing argument is that every thing done in all powerful Parliament would over write others such as the 20/18 points being the basis of the negotiation for the Spirit of Malaysia to be in place and possible the InterGovernmental Committee (IGC) report. In the absence of Malaysia Act 1963 in Malaya, the Parliament of Malaysia would amend anything as time passed by. So the Argument goes on unabated about Malaysia as 4 parties (Singapore included) or Malaysia of 13 units ranging from very big Sarawak and smallest Perlis. If the dispute had started with the Proclamation of Malaysia, it was sort of confirmed by an amendment in the Parliament on 27 August, 1976 so soon after the Double six plane tragedy over Sembulan, Sabah making Sabah and Sarawak as the 12 and 13 states of great diminished status in every respects and aspects within Malaysia. Why amend 13 years later in 1976? Another anomaly with Malaysia if we go the way of thinking of USA (Federal versus States), every states would have a state Government but Malaya from the outset did not maintain its own Government except what we see a Malaysian Government (Federal) overshadowing the Government of Singapore, Government of Sabah, and Government of Sarawak. So what does that tell us? Let the learned legal fraternity in Constitution law tell us of this anomaly of missing Malaya’s Government in term of Spirit of Malaysia. So much from me on the legal framework of the Spirit of Malaysia in the various documents as being exposed by some parties. Now I would go into the reality in the implementation of the true Spirit of Malaysia in the context of power and money as the actual direction of Malaysia in 4 or 3 partners rather than 13 states to share the spoilt. If we give prominence to the Federal Cabinet of Ministers as this connects to power, we would see this a pittance in terms of the number of Sabahans and Sarawakians holding cabinet posts then at the beginning and now. If Malaya, Sabah and Sarawak are 3 in 1, then each partner should have 12 Cabinet ministers each but how much do we have then and now? Search this spirit of power in the right number of clean hands. Also give the quantum of allocation of funds to the various ministries in the “clean” hands of Cabinet members of Sabah and Sarawak as compared with those of Malaya. I hope Nancy can provide such data for the 52 years. So I come to the financial aspect as in all Agreement, there is the financial consideration and implications of contributions and then the sharing of financial responsibilities – give or take or givers or takers? It was great impression at the preliminary negotiation that great help was forthcoming to Sabah and Sarawak being the much less developed partners and would like to remind our people what is recorded in the formative years namely:- Kuala Lumpur and London Talks on Malaysia- Agreement on Establishment of Federation by Malaya, Singapore, Sarawak, and Sabah The financial question s previously in dispute between Singapore and Malaya were settled in the following manner: (1) 60 per cent of the Federal revenue collected in Singapore would be paid to the Singapore Government and 40 per cent to the Federal Government: (2) to assist development in the Borneo territories, Singapore would make available to the Federal Government a 15-year loan of 100,000,000 Malayan dollars, free of interest for the first five years, and a 15-year loan of 50,000,000 Malayan dollars at current market rates in the Federation (i.e. 150,000,000 Malaya dollars in all or about £17,500,000). (Source: Keesing's Contemporary Archives- November 2-9, 1963) So some of my questions would be as follows: Was the Sabah's portion fulfilled? Why the sharing proportion as with Singapore not applied to Sabah? Was Article 8, on the Intergovernmental Committee recommendations fully complied? Was Singapore expelled over Lee Kwan Yee retained as Prime Minister of Singapore holding much power to resources and Malaya unable to fulfil the promise of 60% of gross revenue after two years of trials? As a nation, revenue would go to the Central Government as was this case in Singapore vis-à-vis Malaya? Suddenly, Malaya is awaken by the Spirit of the 40% of net revenue (federal portion) arising in Sabah and Sarawak goes to both partners. Had the Federal Government considered this factor in its accounting system which is likely almost fully consolidated centrally since much earlier years? If that is the case how would the two partners get their shares hence financial breaches is of paramount importance as we will see later. Also a lot of federal revenues come from Sabah and Sarawak sources but not segregated for such basic accounting for 52 years. In response to the 40% net revenue to Sabah, MP of Kota Belud Rahman also Federal Cabinet Minister said Federal Government spends a lot of money in Sabah. I want Rahman to come up with a back up detailed paper on that statement and NOT talk to cheat others. I want to see a detailed balance sheet of Sabah revenue going to KL less the amount Sabah is getting from KL for as long as 52 years. In the balance sheet, please show the fund separately showing the Capital portion mainly for the development and Revenue expenditure to collect all the Federal revenue back to the KL coffers. For most development fund coming to finance Sabah projects, please indicate how much of that had been awarded to the companies in KL where a certain percentage already deducted before the fund come to Sabah for the target project. Your detailed paper would clear all the doubt when all Federal Allocation had been one of thirteen rather than one of three. If he knows history, he should learn that Singapore and Malaya owe Sabah in their pledges a lot of fund prior to 16th September, 1963. With accrued statutory interests of 8%, such promised fund could be tens of billions Ringgit. Would Singapore and Malaya make good such debts made in good faith then. Looking back Sabah had been cheated ab initio. So with some hindsight, I had done much research on private funding or sacrifice and came up with a revealing book “Sabah Wealth – image of wood power” in 2004 where I republished my article published in Daily Express titled “Sabah a case for review in the Msia Plans” 4th July 1999. For 30 years, from 1971 to 2000 in 6 Malaysia Plans, the equal partners of Sabah and Sarawak only got allocations of 5.58% and 6.11% respectively when Malaya got 88.3% out of a total of RM229billion. So the financial allocations without the return of 40% net revenue really spells out the real intention of Malaya side lining the Queen’s Obligations that partnership was fake. So it was an evil intention that an amendment was done in 1976 to confirm the question of Spirit of Malaysia. The financial allocations for Sabah in annual budget and the recent Malaysia Plans namely 8, 9 and 10 from 2001-2015 were clearly inadequate per capita when Federal Conspiracy had brought in one to two millions project IC holders in Sabah evident in the Royal Commission of Inquiry on Illegal Immigrants Sabah (RCIIIS) 2012-2014 with a sort of “fake” Royal Report. The is clearly a breach of the partnership by a demographic felony or misdemeanour of Malaya as the well being of Sabah had been very much challenged and allegation of Genocide (ethnic cleansing & “apartheid”) is not unfounded when illegal given project IC become bumiputra overnight. Wither RCIIIS in 2015? The other major financial debacle is the Petroleum Development Act (Act 144) in 1974 could be construed as breach of MA63 as it was not there in 1963, and what followed with the oil agreement in 1976 of 5 % Royaty after the skyline “broken” over Sembulan and blood in the shallow water, we cannot accept that equal partners have to lose so much more to the dominant player. All these happened before the Parliament amended the Constitution to 12 and 13 states in 1976 and see how this conspiracy developed to cover up something which the Spirit of Malaysia did not expect to have happened when the expressive hope of much help for Sabah and Sarawak from Malaya and Singapore was dashed. Is there any silver lining now that PM had affirmed the Commemorative booklet after 52 years? Would Nancy be in the real position to handle the so many breaches of the Spirit of Malaysia in various context? Can we set up an Interim Good Governance Government Malaysia (IGGG M) to resolve or dissolve Malaysia in amicable atmosphere without any shouting and boasting. Was it the founder Tunku Abdul Rahman’s intention alone that Malaysia had turned out this way? He was still around in 1973-1976. Did he voice out anything? Now it would appear that Malaya had done it Malaya’s Way wounding the Spirit of Malaysia incredibly and not repayable or irreparable? So what is the way forward, Nancy? Obviously, there are a few options open in an Agreement even without going to Court as she urged. The options of various dimensions could be worked out like any breach of Agreement. What happen if the Constitution and the Acts of Parliament are breached? Is there really a Malaysia or the Spirit therof? One thing is for sure there is no stopping now after 52 years and possible to exert pressure for a reverse takeover to empower Sabah and Sarawak for the execution of MA63 to the letters and the Spirit thereof albeit 52 years later no matter the cost thereof. Joshua Y. C. Kong 23 September, 2015

Joshua Kong -PM of IGGG M

OPEN letter to DYMM YDP Agong and all concerned citizens Very important & urgent for action Who can hold Malaysia together in this time like this. 50 years and more is enough and enough is enough. Nation building needs sacrifice, no doubt but it is lopsidedness that has prevailed against people especially in Sabah including Labuan and Sarawak. To get to the point fast, I would like to focus more on Sabah including Labuan in this OPEN letter, while Sarawak scenario is also obvious relevant. Needless to mention Sabah’s poverty is getting worst despite some “stupid” claims otherwise from somewhere. Poverty, oppression and underprivileged scenario are very important elements in nation building for a better tomorrow for all. Poverty is getting worst Sabah people is already hard pressed in term of adequate income to sustain a decent living for decades. Now with Goods and Service Tax at 6% where would such poor people get their income to cover for such additional outlay. Prices across the board have risen since 1st April, 2015 even for most items with zero rate or exempt items. Some sources claim anything up to RM90 for any family would be the tax for GST. So where would such income come from for this additional burden? On the other hand if the collection of GST from the poor people of RM500m to RM1b per annum, where would such revenue go to? The nation with national debts of almost a trillion ringgit mainly due to massive and endless corruption and profligacy would simply swallow the additional revenue from GST. GST can only be a progressive item if the high income as anticipated would materialise but for Sabah it is far from it even until 2020 under the present BN/UMNO administration with a culture of recalcitrance. Oppression is anti nationalism Sabah people including Labuan have been oppressed for decades by none other by those who claim to be socalled leaders (State and Federal) for decades. Under schemes of largely heavily rigged general elections at the start of USNO and then perpetrated by the UMNO since the 1990s, oppression of endless possibilities has prevailed. I would not say the PBS and Berjaya Government were any better but they did provide the breaks of sort of “oppression” and we have not learned from history. Oppression have been in various forms within and without namely arrivals of excessive alien people which I call “Extra People Identity Cards” holders or “Project IC” holders displacing the genuine local Sabahans which is akin to the much abhorred term such as “Ethnic Cleansing” and with this development come sort of disgusted “Apartheid”. Another arena where oppression prevails is that our wealth such as timber, palm oil and crude oil have been diverted elsewhere for nation building when Sabah remains marginalised and sidelined with much lopsidedness in so many desperate areas that need to be addressed but largely neglected for lack of funding. Underprivileged since 1960s. Without referring to the founding personalities and the paper only agreements and terms such as Malaysia Agreement 1963/Malaysia Act 1963, 20 points and the Federal Constitution as amended many times over 50 years, it is imperative that we acknowledge there was a sort of partnership (written or unwritten) that has gone awry ab initio. I think Tungku Abdul Rahman did acknowledge that North Borneo or Sabah now was an underprivileged place with underprivileged people in 1960s and even promised that Malaysia or Malaya would make Sabah as prosperous and developed on par with the Malaya then. However, reality is that Sabah remains the back water zone for 50 years. Sabah and Labuan remains underprivileged as we know today. Give Nation Building a chance but how? With much wealth from natural resources gone in Sabah, we need to address this nation building as it should be but now more burdens and blocks are added on from within and without. Without viable and adequate sovereign funds, nation building in Sabah and Sarawak would be inevitable neglected. Instead Sabah/Labuan & Sarawak are further oppressed by several important developments in the nation on the verge of disintegration namely economy decline and massive debts rising, oppressive and archaic old laws as added or amended, the questioned the Islamic Criminal Law especially Hudud affecting all in an agreed secular Federal Constitution, internal and external threats and rise of regional and global terrorism, added poverty from GST, marginalisation, “ethnic cleansing”, “apartheid”, massive corruption and illicit fund outflows, the dead claim on Sabah still allowed by the “leaders” hence Sabah would be forever remain underprivileged. Conclusion. We have seen in history how nations go bust by design or otherwise. Once great and mighty USSR was “bada bing”. So how do we hold Malaysia together or otherwise? Joshua Y C Kong PM of Interim Good Governance Government Malaysia (IGGG M) http://fresh-air-in-iggg.blogspot.com

Fresh air saves Malaysia and the world

Why I chose such as title is from God to save Sabah, Malaysia & the world.

0:11 Some 17 years ago, I became allergic to Delhi's air. My doctors told me that my lung capacity had gone down to 70 percent, and it was killing me. With the help of IIT, TERI, and learnings from NASA, we discovered that there are three basic green plants, common green plants, with which we can grow all the fresh air we need indoors to keep us healthy. We've also found that you can reduce the fresh air requirements into the building, while maintaining industry indoor air-quality standards.

0:47 The three plants are Areca palm, Mother-in-Law's Tongue and money plant. The botanical names are in front of you. Areca palm is a plant which removes CO2 and converts it into oxygen. We need four shoulder-high plants per person, and in terms of plant care, we need to wipe the leaves every day in Delhi, and perhaps once a week in cleaner-air cities. We had to grow them in vermi manure, which is sterile, or hydroponics, and take them outdoors every three to four months. The second plant is Mother-in-law's Tongue, which is again a very common plant, and we call it a bedroom plant, because it converts CO2 into oxygen at night. And we need six to eight waist-high plants per person. The third plant is money plant, and this is again a very common plant; preferably grows in hydroponics. And this particular plant removes formaldehydes and other volatile chemicals.

1:51 With these three plants, you can grow all the fresh air you need. In fact, you could be in a bottle with a cap on top, and you would not die at all, and you would not need any fresh air. We have tried these plants at our own building in Delhi, which is a 50,000-square-feet, 20-year-old building. And it has close to 1,200 such plants for 300 occupants. Our studies have found that there is a 42 percent probability of one's blood oxygen going up by one percent if one stays indoors in this building for 10 hours. The government of India has discovered or published a study to show that this is the healthiest building in New Delhi. And the study showed that, compared to other buildings, there is a reduced incidence of eye irritation by 52 percent, respiratory systems by 34 percent, headaches by 24 percent, lung impairment by 12 percent and asthma by nine percent. And this study has been published on September 8, 2008, and it's available on the government of India website.

2:59 Our experience points to an amazing increase in human productivity by over 20 percent by using these plants. And also a reduction in energy requirements in buildings by an outstanding 15 percent, because you need less fresh air. We are now replicating this in a 1.75-million-square-feet building, which will have 60,000 indoor plants.

3:24 Why is this important? It is also important for the environment, because the world's energy requirements are expected to grow by 30 percent in the next decade. 40 percent of the world's energy is taken up by buildings currently, and 60 percent of the world's population will be living in buildings in cities with a population of over one million in the next 15 years. And there is a growing preference for living and working in air-conditioned places. "Be the change you want to see in the world," said Mahatma Gandhi. And thank you for listening. (Applause)

Malaysia Day Message 2014

Malaysia Day 2014 message from PM of IGGG

This very important message for 2014 is likely a re-enforcement of putting our human rights in Sabah into proper perspectives based on facts and not on disillusion of largely untrustworthy people holding some positions in the nation but irresponsible to make immediate correction of errors – true and fake – in the past.  Don’t be deceived by lies of illegal leaders when repeated for 51 years have become the truth especially about the existence of “Malaysia” when such nation does not appear in legal paper or legal constitution.  Who want to accept the argument that there are things that are not in written form in the Constitution or the unwritten portion in the Constitution?  I would consider such statements would come from the CRIMINALS in Government.

1.         31 August and 16 September

The argument that “Malaysia” can emulate the USA style of Federation is based on a deceit as it is comparing an apple [Malaya] with a pear [Malaysia].  “Malaysia” – proper or not – was assumed to be in existence after a series of illegalities in the written agreements now under close scrutiny.  What is the status of the Malaysia Agreement 1963 is now exposed as simply invalid.  The position assumed was that Sarawak [S], Sabah [S], Malaya [M] got their independence from the common colonial master – the Great Britain – on 22 July, 1963, 31^st August, 1963 and 31^st August, 1957.  There was nothing about independence when “malaysia” was formed on 16^th September, 1963 by the S,S,M together with Singapore which later “left” “Malaysia” on 7^th August, 1965.  So 16^th September, 2014, the 51^st anniversary has nothing to do with independence.  “Malaysia” or rather Malaya had just celebrated the 57^th Independence Day [red herring] on 31^st August, 2014   Can we get this clear now?  If anyone is not happy about what I write based on the history, then I would call the 16^th September, 2014 as a “slavery” day of “Malaya” as far as Sabah and Sarawak are concerned.  If we are not in slavery of the “Malaya” whose people call themselves the Malays and Tun Dr Mahathir call them as “thieves”, then why are we so much behind Singapore with scarce resources to start with when the GB just wished to ‘abandon’ Singapore in the mid 1950s as Singapore was ‘independent’ in July 1959.  Singapore GDP per capita in 2013 was USD50,000 while SSM with vast natural resources was only USD11,000.  I think as far as Sabah and Sarawak are concerned our GDP per capita is much less at about USD3,000.  I hope you can prove me wrong if we are not in “slavery” of sort.  Much of the GDP in Sabah is allocated to foreigners.  So my wish for 51^st “Malaysia” day is for Sabah to be set free from such bondage and image of “slavery” before it is really too late for the fate of 28million people in the nation.  There is a lot of hard struggle to do this now.

2.                  Malaysian or 1Malaysia as pure slogan

I am not going to write much about this as there is no sincerity on the reality of the perception.  We all know in our hearts, minds, souls and spirits, such thing as 1Malaysia does not prevail in reality and it is a slogan forever when the existing dubious Government has a different perspective.  Similarly slogans in the past like Amanah, Bersih, Cekap  and Cemerlang Gemilang, Terbilang and ….have largely been for show only to feel good by some people.

3.                  Isaiah organic mattress

Who would we expect that such a special product with a Biblical name has come to the nation?  So what does it serve as an indicator?  Isaiah is a name of a chapter/ book in the Bible, organic is a special concept of well being, and mattress is what we sleep on it daily for comfort.   Every book in the Holy Bible has messages for all human beings and so is Isaiah in its prophetic message.  In 1998, God reveals to me Isaiah 45, 46, and 47 for the nation.  Then I forwarded this timely message to the then Prime Minister Tun Dr Mahathir on the indicator of the direction of the nation.  I will post this brief booklet on my blog later.  As you know, ‘Malaysia” was in financial turmoil and the losses have not been recovered till today.  So we should find comfort in the message of Isaiah for Sabah especially as Sabah like Sarawak have been largely a Christian country until gradual erosion after the contagious effect/impact of Malaya..

4.                  Flags –Jalur Gemilang

Over the recent years, the zeal of the people in Sabah to fly the national flag – Jalur Gemilang has waned.  The message of physical manifestation is clear as it is in the hearts of people where we belong.  The flag is symbol of truth, and when that is not the “truth” people can see through it.  So let it be when “slavery” of sort is unbearable..

5.                  Important matters – MA1963, Oil & Gas, Bank Negara’s printers; Security,

These are important matters that must be addressed accordingly and come up with solutions for the well being of all.  There is no justice in the way “Malaysia” has handled in 51 years where legality, wealth sharing, robbery can affect everyone as far as security is concerned.

6.                  Report of RCI IIS

Where is the much expected Report of the Royal Commission of Inquiry on Illegal Immigrants Sabah long delayed for almost a year?  As it is a Royal Commission, who can block the emergence of the said report which is so essential for the security and justice in Sabah?  Does it imply that the King has a hand with such regression?  Do we need to call another RCI to establish the truth of the suppression? If such published Report can very much disturb the security as perceived by some quarters, such people should not be in high office any more.  Such entanglement was the “creation” of such people in the first place especially it is known beyond any grain of doubt that Musa Aman and his small committee still holding top positions in Sabah had issues 400,000 blue identity cards to illegal people for their selfish gains –financially and politically with rampant consequences of “ethnic cleansing and apartheid” in Sabah and beyond.  It is also a scam of Malaya to harm Sabah.

7.                  MAS, Proton, Khazanah, EPF (Battersea), Petronas etc

Does the nation have any sovereign fund to ensure the well beings of the people in years to come as the global challenge bites in the communities in the nation?  What we know and what we can see is that the nation has already over committed to various major adventures and misadventures – locally and globally- resulting in inevitable financial strains and crisis of unacceptable economic proportions in the near terms.  We are selling our raw commodities at floor bottom low prices when we should deal in value-added items especially in the food industries. Why Petronas invested the fund largely derived from Sabah and Sarawak into foreign projects and very little returned to the two states until recently?

8.                  Environment – Concrete Jungle and TAB

Does that really mean progress when some quarters only concentrate on more concrete buildings in already congested areas such as Kota Kinabalu, Sabah?  It is replacing a once  friendly environment with much concrete jungle causing much disruption in communication when there are not enough roads and car parking especially in already built up areas in Kota Kinabalu.  Consumers and residents would soon find it very difficult to get in and out of Kota Kinabalu’s Central Business District especially when public transport is largely inadequate and unreliable. The uncontrollable taste for concrete jungle has also gone beyond Kota Kinabalu city proper so much so that Tanjung Aru Beach [TAB] away from the city would never be the same when buildings of all sorts would rise up from the pristine beach once white and sandy.  The evil pretext to improve the much neglected eco status of TAB by design of the CRIMINALS in Government for decades by DBKK is to totally destroy the natural place for personal gains given the sky rocket prices of prime land in Sabah especially in Kota Kinabalu.  When finally TAB faces its fatal fate, where else would there be untouchable in Sabah?  So we must stop TAB by TAEDSD at all costs as the likely destruction with much reclamation of the seashores is irreversible by whatever human intervention.  What is more beautiful if it is not God’s Creation?  Who want to claim that they can do better than God?

9.                  Goods and Service Tax (GST)

What is GST really when it is implemented in “Malaysia” when her threshold to prosperity is questioned?  With GST, it is a totally different game in the economy.  Is “Malaysia” prepared for that?  From all the recent press releases and press conferences, I think many do not know what is GST when it is implemented especially in corruption riddled administration?  Even the preliminary stage of registration has already exposed the weak points of GST in the context of acceptance of the people especially the business community and the consumers at large.  Does the administration know how many would be eligible to be registered?  Why it is only twelve weeks away that less than 15% is registered? Would this be a “last minute” effort?  Would the whole process be meaningless as initial costs are too much for the business community? The illegal PM had declared BN/UMNO with the endless possibilities.  So what are the possibilities with the event on 1^st April, 2015? Would those foreign speakers coming with arm chair - lack of hands on - experience really motivate the business community with the registration where costs of implementation can be quite hefty.   Business people spending their own hard earned money would like to see through the process counting the costs involved. That would not be a problem for the public listed companies and Government linked companies to incurred such preliminary expenditure in relevant costly items.  If BN/UMNO have endless possibilities, the hard pressed business community would also have to weigh all the possibilities including the acceptance of the consumers at large in many scenarios.

10.              Rigged GE and Pakistan

It is beyond any grain of doubt that General Election 2013 was again rigged heavily in favour of BN/UMNO by none other than the Election Commission of Malaysia (ECM).  This is also confirmed by the attitude of Malays by Tun Dr Mahathir as money is too tempting.  Rigging has been going on for decades and how can ECM be absolved of the crime against humanity? Yes, the opposition did win more seats in GE13.  If not for the repeated rigging or “raping” of the voters, Pakatan would be in Putrajaya like it or not.  My views on the rigging have been confirmed in GE2004, GE2008 and GE2013 in meticulous scrutiny.  I went to the High Court over GE2004 and GE2008 but were simply struck off by the questioned/conditioned judge even when there was a “walkover” in early hearing for me to proceed to full trial when the defendants for GE2008 did not appear before the early bias Judge.  ECM denied everything but it realized its crimes and when GE2013 came about, ECM did cover its tracks by two steps namely an important item was omitted in the official Gazette when compared with early GEs and the correction of discrepancies by publishing a second edition of the Gazette.  With two editions of the Gazette on GE13, it confirmed rigging.  Pakistan is at the present embroiled in a tussle of rigged General Elections with civil disobedience, and where would it be heading for?  Similarly, the CRIMINALS in Government in Malaysia are so happy to be warming the seats with all sort of threats using now the possible defunct “Sedition Act” of 1948 to cover their tracks.  So I had proposed since GE2004 for an Interim Good Governance Government Malaysia or IGGG M as a solution to the impasse of illegal Government with all the illegal authority to destroy the nation with a possible Bada bing for “Malaysia”.

11.              Race & Religion???

Where on earth can a religion change a race?  Did God say that?  Why is it seditious?  Is it seditious to comment on the Federal Constitution which is no longer “sacred” with so much dubious and genuine amendments over 51 years?  Isn’t it very strange that the Federal Constitution states Malay =Muslim= Malay?  Why strange if Arabs also Muslims are not Malay?  Why so special about ‘Malaysia” when its legality is questioned? Sabah was never a Malay=Muslims=Malay in 1963 if its independence is to be respected.

12.              Secession?, separation?, leave?,  kicked out?, divorced? or simply abandoned???

This is seditious matter and it is a Federal Constitution item. We cannot talk about a legal item be it in the Constitution or otherwise?  So far so good, we have been intact for 51 years of “neglected” marriage but “Malaysia” never talked of love.  Was “malaysia” thing a love at first sight or Sabah was betrothed by arranged marriage of the British Empire disintegrating like a “big bang” or a “big divorce” or forsaken children as orphans? Or was “malaysia” a new family in 1963 after a rare event somewhere?  Now after 51 years, the theme for celebration on 31^st August, 2014 has finally emerged to express LOVE for Malaysia, LOVE in Malaysia.  Was Singapore “kicked out” of “Malaysia” in 1965?  We know many married couples once in love were then divorced with great responsibilities subsequently for the wife or wives.  So when some illegal leaders come up with LOVE for Malaysia in 2014, can we not talk of “divorce” or face seditious charge?   So is this theme on “LOVE” another indication for the nation in the face of disparity, oppression, lopsidedness, injustice, neglect, ab initio and now much aggravated and exacerbated by endless possibilities of BN/UMNO.  Can we cry over LOVE meaning “Leave Over Very End” or “Leave Out Very End” as really intolerable now as the last resort?  Can we see some sense in this as in marriage it is “till death do us depart”?  Can “Malaysia” as a questioned marriage for its legality be facing any real “death”?  So it is DEATH for “Malaysia” when Sabah, Sarawak & Malaya do depart which should have taken place in 1965.   If Malaya could not hold on with Singapore for whatever reasons, can you sincerely believe that Malaya can still hold on to Sabah and Sarawak when all the signs are already there for a bada bing divorce.  Under Act 750, our oil wealth already taken geographically.  If we want to debate on this “bada bing” of “Malaysia” to prepare ourselves for such an eventuality, it is a totally different forum.   We all know that in good times of the nation, Sabah and Sarawak had been largely left out in the main stream of development as Menteri Besar of Kedah Datuk Mukriz Mahathir had said “Kedah would not be today as developed if not for the wealth and resources of Sabah.”  I think all the states in Malaya can say the same.  So when bad times come to the nation inevitably, where would Sabah and Sarawak be?

So mulling over LOVE as “Leave Over Very End” or “Leave Out Very End”, as the cry is getting more intense and loud as far as in the Great Britain, are we in better position to prepare that day when LOVE is the deciding factor in the nation?  We know Sabah and Sarawak were ill prepared to go the “Malaysia” way in 1963 but hard scenario present tough decisions even after a process called IGC, Cobbold commission, 20/18 points with UN intervention?   In 1963, there were sudden confrontations from the neighbours then and somehow they were ‘weathered’ over 51 years despite the unending challenge. Today, Sabah is still in similar scenario of that unending challenge and life and fear go on hand in hand.

In 1963, there was the Azahari that broke up the intended 5 nations in “Malaysia” and today “Malaysia” can only go wayward bada bing and who is there to seal the final chapter of “Malaysia”?  Would it be DJ?

13.  Conclusion

  An Interim Good Governance Government would be in order to work for an appropriate solution rather than a bada bing for “Malaysia” and no ensuing violence of any sort within and without. We come in peace and we go in peace once and for all.  Fear not what is ahead as it was in 1963.

God bless all.

Joshua Y. C. Kong PM of  IGGG  16 September, 2014   6013-8394513

Message of PM of IGGG M

MESSAGE of Prime Minister of IGGG M on Agung’s Birthday 2014

This is a very sincere and hard message for all in Malaysia to address today woes in the nation.

NO soft talking as it is useless and meaningless to do that to cover the doom of the nation.  Everyone should be informed of the truth nothing but the truth to set the nation free irrespective of the religious and race.

Is the nation already bankrupt ?  Is the expected Foreign Direct Investment coming to the nation to help build the nation for all?

In Malaysia we have lots of oil and gas revenue plus other major commodities but how much is Sovereign Fund Malaysia?  What we know we have substantial poverty in the nation especially in Sabah and Sarawak being half of the nation if ever Malaysia exists legally or rather a sham.  A big number of citizens in urban and rural areas in Sabah have next to nothing.

If I write too long a message, many may not bother to read it.

So I would dwell in some key areas namely autonomy since Malaysia Agreement 1963 for Sabah and Sarawak, the wealth of Sabah & Sarawak, the human rights of genuine people in Sabah and Sarawak  In this message I would relate more of Sabah vis-à-vis Sarawak and Malaya wherever relevant and important.

As a nation for 50 years, there is no excuse there is such a lopsided scenario in all aspects of the nation in relation to the economy, financial capabilities, development in infrastructure and security  in the context of Vision 2020.  

In 50 years, much fund from Sabah and Sarawak had been diverted elsewhere for the national needs especially in Malaya.  It is timely as an initial effort to pay back to Sabah and Sarawak what had been siphoned off for other priorities in the nation then and now it to address the lopsidedness in Sabah and Sarawak as in the process of Interim Good Governance Government (IGGG) Malaysia to make national transformation more focused and positive.

In this message, we cannot avoid the related issues such as the Double Six tragedy in Sembulan on 6^th June, 1976 which could not be an accident of the incoming plane at Kota Kinabalu airport; the Petronas Agreement signed on 12^th June, 1976 ; now the Agung birthday and the same Agung was also the head of nation in 1976; the autonomy of Malaysia Agreement 1963.

First does the Malaya’s Federation really recognize the Malaysia Agreement 1963?

About the Double Six Tragedy, some of the people still living to tell their knowledge of the crash which I strongly believe was caused by a bomb – a timed bomb – which did not go off in time when the plane is still in mid air.  So there was intervention of the landing by someone known to everyone at the air control tower and the officers at the Civil Aviation Department should know who that person is.  When this person always writing in Daily Express passes away, the whole story would explode and the surviving family would have to face the wrath of some people unless this infamous person now apologise to the public for his knowledge of the landing.  Today is the best time to do that or he leave the details in the Will.  A bomb was obvious because the terrible twisted wreckage cannot be a normal fall from such a low height in Sembulan landing on the low water.  The pictures are available.

After this wreckage, came the wretched thing the Petronas Agreement which is in principal against the spirit and letter of the autonomy of Malaysia Agreement 1963.  Sabah was in need of all the available resources after the timber to develop Sabah but we got was a pittance.

The voice to get back our oil and gas wealth is getting louder with Najib’s latest promise to review the level of the oil royalties for Sabah.

In the spirit and letter of autonomy for Sabah, it is 100% of the oil and gas to be returned to Sabah.  If that is not possible for all the Petroleum Sharing Contracts had been signed away under Petroleum Development Act 1974- Act 144, I am demanding RM100billions since 1976 to be maintained as the Sabah Sovereign Fund.

So why RM100billions for Sabah and another RM100billions for Sarawak?

1. The exploitation of oil and gas in Sabah had been done without transparency and actually excessively done and Sabah has not been given the supporting basis for the payment of 5% since 1976.

2. There is no monitoring body and the Council for PDA may be non existent.

3. The successive Prime Ministers must come up with a document to show how much of Petronas money had gone into terrorism and other illegitimate expenditure?  The Petronas accounts and activities are questioned.

4. The oil and gas of Sabah could be sold under forward contract at artificial low prices not revised by hefty rise of the global price trend.  This may affect the 5% paid and payable to Sabah.

5. If for 38 year at RM4billion, it would work out to more than RN100billion and not include the accrued interest for the said period and if interest is compounded it could be at least RM300billions to Sabah and another similar amount to Sarawak.

If Malaya is really sincere in 2014, would not RM200billions or RM600billions bankrupt the nation.  Who cares if the nation is bankrupted by their own faults so deep into coveted ness, corruption, graft, embezzlement, wasteful spending or profligacy with irresponsible and  non transparent administration.   One very obvious expenditure as alleged is the RM100m allocation to the socalled first lady office for an authorized appropriation.  Isn’t it true when the socalled PM never disputed this? It was revealed a few year ago, but he now decide to sue Malaysiakini for some similar allegations of his mismanagement.

If Malaya had been fully developed using resources from Sabah and Sarawak, those investments should have earned enough to pay back to Sabah and Sarawak of the money so demanded now so that Sabah and Sarawak can be similarly developed albeit belated to catch up with Malaya for vision 2020 as developed status as 1Malaysia.  Can Sabah and Sarawak catch up in 5 years?

If Malaya cannot provide the much desired fund, then the nation is bankrupt now and Malaysia would not exist in 2019.

 Sabah cannot be the fixed deposit state / nation of BN/UMNO if such fund as demanded is not forthcoming because it would be bankrupted in 2015.

We either have a bankrupted nation or be saved by IGGG M  with a well balanced nation in all aspects.  BN/UMNO is at the end of the road of endless possibilities since 1946/1957/1963.  There is no other message to the nation now.

BN/UMNO, Do or die now, and it is better to do first and die to allow the nation to live on.

Joshua Y. C. Kong

PM of IGGG M since 2008.

NOW - OPEN message on IGGG M

OPEN LETTER to all the socalled leaders

This is indeed an important letter on old and new issues faced by Sabah since 1963.

What has gone through in the History of Sabah cannot be undone but should be reviewed accordingly.

What is still going on in Sabah needs to be addressed accordingly.

What I am writing is about the terrorism still ongoing in Sabah arising from the neighbouring countries namely Philippines and Indonesia.

We know of the many issues since 1963 and obviously still unresolved.

The major one is the very old claim on Sabah by the Philippines which has sort of become academic relevance.  Although it is a dead claim but some people still want to use that as a punching bag against Sabah.

Also Sabah is also entangled by some past and present socalled leaders in dealing with the neighbours for known and unknown agenda.

It is known as how Tun Mustapha had entangled Sabah with Manila and the Southern Philippines and the bitterness thereof is still prevailing in some quarters within and without Sabah. 

While many old issues have not been resolved, new issues had surfaced in recent decades.

Some people prefer to settle such issues by way of terrorism including kidnapping and shooting of people in Sabah.

While such instances could have the motive of financial demands, there can be other reasons privy to those who had committed such heinous crimes in Sabah in recent decades.

I do not have the privilege to handle such heinous crimes and the people involved in these high profile crimes but some people who have access to such scenarios had written about some of them.

In the case of the dead Sabah claim, there are people who continue to pursue such claims privately to the leaders in Malaya and elsewhere.  Obviously such claims are really too much and are not entertained up to date.  Such dubious claims do not give anyone the right to resort to violence and terrorism especially to what happened in Tandauo in Lahad Datu area deemed to be an armed invasion or intrusion in early 2012.

Apart from the dubious claim, there maybe a few more recent events or incidences of discontent arising from dealings by recent socalled state and federal leaders.

Unfortunately, whatever Sabah had done in dealing with such neighbours had not be reciprocated by sort of mutual kindness.  Instead, Sabah had encountered the blunt of such concessions given to the neighbours in terms of aids, job opportunities, shelter from crisis in their homeland etc.

The illegal concessions of IMM13 and Project IC to the foreigners definitely brought a lot of heart breaks to Sabah and Sabahans and beyond.  A foreigner with Project IC was employed by a bank in Kuala Lumpur as security guard who one fine day shot a bank manager and got away with a loot of almost half a million Ringgit Malaysia.  Many such heinous crimes have happened reported or unreported.

It is also reported that Project IC in the late eighties and early nineties where the socalled leaders from the State and sanctioned by the prominent leader Mahathir in Kuala Lumpur all told in the recent concluded Royal Commission of Inquiry on Illegal Immigrants Sabah (RCI IIS) has brought about a long string of endless terrors in Sabah and beyond.

It is also reported that the kidnap of 21 tourists in Sipadan Island in April, 2000 was mainly due to unsettled debts from getting foreigners to come to Sabah in a million to enable them to be given Project IC.  Our own Sabah “leaders” or traitors should now confess to the cause of this heinous crime which had since affected Sabah adversely very much.  I hope Musa Aman can tell us the full story of the Project IC leading to that kidnap.  Has it ever being resolved?  I also hope the report on RCI IIS as delayed but due any time now would bring out more details.

While the Project IC under the care of Musa Aman will never be resolved peaceful, Sabah and Sabahans would be forever under that endless curse.

With that endless curse in our midst, yet another curse has surface with the name of Aman Futures Philippine Group (AFPG) and somehow this 12 billion peso alleged scam is connected to Sabah possibly with the word “AMAN”.   Where would the convincing “resources” of AFPG come from if not from some connections in Sabah?  Would this story be fully told when the brain behind that alleged scam have been arrested in the reported persons of Abigail Pendulas and  Manuel Amalilio with “dual” citizenships?

Can this alleged Aman scam give rise to several kidnaps and heinous crimes in Sabah in recent months?  It is obvious that some people having lost so much money as much as 12 billion peso or 1 billion Ringgit Malaysia in a short period could resort to other tough methods to recover the losses in other ways.  Who can stop them using “mercenaries” to re-coup their losses?  Ultimately, it is Sabah, Sabahans and Malaysians who lose out in such apprehensive scenario in Sabah’s east coast.

Sabah has been victimized by all things done by the nation and the nation’s socalled leaders in so many ways.  When would such victimization be ended?  Can such socalled leaders who have entangled themselves in such heinous crimes loose them from such entrapment when they remain in office as great liars and hypocrites.  I have always written we have too many CRIMINALS in Federal and State Governments.

I would call on these socalled leaders installed by the rigging of the Election Commission of Malaysia (ECM) as confirmed by the two editions of the Government’s Gazette for the General Election 2013 and other similar rigging by ECM for GE 2004, GE2008 with the records all laid before the High Court of Sabah and Sarawak in 2008 and 2009.  What the ECM did with the two editions of the Gazette in GE2013 was actually trying to correct the discrepancies I had identified as fraudulent/manipulative practice or rigging of ECM in GE2004 and GE2008.  So what was in the two editions of the Gazette in GE2013 was guilt as charged by me in GE2004 and GE2008 and shaming the Judiciary which simply found the easy way to strike out my two laborious cases with total evidence.

All the issues faced by Sabah can be brought to live with a book as large as a few thousand pages. 

It would be another great sacrifice to present such a massive book while Sabah, Sabahans, especially half of Sabah in the east coast would be in strife for a decent living when curfew would be enforced.  Such curfew would also not solve the crisis of terror as long as the socalled leaders do not come clean with their own heinous crimes.

Every Sabahan deserve a better deal with Malaya, Philippine, and Indonesia and not live in the shadows of the own leaders in crimes.

In conclusion, do not blame the release of the full report of RCI IIS for fresh terror in Sabah and beyond for the unclean hands of people cannot remain in the positions of power.

Enough is Enough, a total change in Malaysia especially in Sabah and Sarawak with the Interim Good Governance Government Malaysia (IGGGM) is the only option left now for a new beginning to stop the rot getting worst.  

Let God be God in Malaysia.

Joshua Y. C. Kong    8^th May, 2014

58. Clear message over MH370

Withered MH370?  (a positive write up after 7 days of fruitless SAR)

There are many theories but did the plane crash? If not, why not?  Still looking for evidence of the crashed debris?  Even the Australian women came out with pictures of the “playful” pilot on board once which could imply that the plane crashed due to sort of negligence?.  Where is the black box?

So with the missing plane MH370 when I secured 37 votes in Api-Api 1986 and when 239 is my birthday 238 +1, and such figures really tickle my mind to say something rather than nothing as I strongly believe that Interim Good Governance Government in Malaysia (IGGG M) be installed now with Joshua Kong as PM to sort out the mess of BN/UMNO for 50 years and more.  Why 370 and why 239?  Numbers are symbolic of events past and present and days to come.  Not numerology but they do convey Godly messages like 7 is the number of completion. Now the numbers of the flights such as 371, 372 etc have been changed to 318, 319 hopefully can find the plane with the changes of numbers and 239 ?

So much for the brain teasing.  Raja Bomoh like it or not - be it Black or white- is very part and parcel of the real life in Malaysia and beyond.  What is the difference between Bomohism and Clairvoyance? Most politicians use them. Raja Bomoh in his first statement was eagle caught hold of the plane and how can an eagle catch hold of a plane?  That is symbolic in a vision and it is held in mid air meaning a nation in the north likely Russia, Mongolia, Korea (North & South) ??? and which nation looks like Korea ???  Has South Korea comes into the SAR?

Najib came out with a RM1 dressed chicken lifted into the air despite the “Billion Ringgit as per estimated insurance claims and still counting” MH370 missing?  Why?  Who was killed naked by C4 ?  Was that also a “chicken” who was rumoured to be pregnant???

Like any disasters, the spiritualists are used for unknown normal information as spiritualists can have “access” to the people on the other side?  Has any spiritualists already consulted if what Christians may say would not matter?  Ask Doris Stock of UK.

The ringing but an unanswered one of handphone is also relevant and so is the Royce Engine could be active to send the “DNA” message to some sensitive monitoring equipment including the satellites in today’s high tech society albeit denied by the acting Transport Minister?

Like any hijack as in 911, fake or stolen passports were reported used.  So it is so in MH370.

If it is hijack and the victims handed over to the kidnappers for ransom and if this is the case, it would be to the tune of Billions of Ringgit for MAS (on the way to bankruptcy) or Malaysia (also on the way to bankruptcy).  If it is an international hijack, it is very important to keep this secret especially it is a USA’s aircraft involved as US could bomb the target be it held in which country?  So the choice is for MAS and Malaysia to pay or not for the ransom demanded?  So it is likely a bankruptcy getting nearer for MAS and Malaysia if indeed a hijack is disclosed to the world.  If it is known that a hijack is related to vendetta of sort, then who would fly with MAS again internationally?  You all know the evils of BN/UMNO especially of the socalled leaders symbolized by the two green coconuts of Raja Bomoh plus the magic flask (pulu) in its team to capture the active spirit

Also don’t ignore this point that the plane diverted 40% prior to Vietnam and possibly to avoid all the top monitoring equipment on the coastal areas of China as any unlit and non responding aircraft would be forced to land by military jets.  So did the plane take the route of wilderness (once also the silk route) to avoid military responses in the air to reach the destination in the North for this well planned hijack?

So I hope the crash whether confirmed or otherwise, the basis of rumour would go on over the restive spirit which was cleared as missing in the Immigration Records.

So the kidnappers or hijackers would want the money and so they just keep quiet to the outside world and some few people would know it.   With a Boeing 777-200 and 239 persons missing, the whole deal is worth a lot of money reaching into billions of Ringgit.  The plane itself would be worth a lot of money if ransom not paid.

So with the mysterious plane missing after 7 days, it is as good as gone with those lives?

If it is sitting somewhere in the wilderness, would such people survive the harsh conditions?  If the location of the plane is identified, what can Malaysia do if it is really a hijack to rescue the hostages?  Only Isreal could do it like in the Entebbe case in Uganda?  If USA is involved, it would be very costly exercise too as lives would be in terrible jeopardy.  Any known or exposed negotiations would place Malaysia in very bad light too if only we know why such an incident can happen?  Even the very expensive costly submarines are possibly lying “idle” similar to missing in action.  Silence is bliss to some.

So like someone also blame Najib but I need to go further to blame BN/UMNO for the total imaginable malaise in Malaysia and MH370 has been waiting to come to pass.  So the evils of BN/UMNO has come full circle in the international arena.  Now Peninsula is enveloped with terrible haze in many parts as high as over 300 in the haze indicator readings today.  God bless all Malaysians as we pray for the nation for those in the plane.

IGGG M is the solution.

Joshua Kong

PM of IGGG M