Friday, August 5, 2016
Fresh air for IGGG M
Malaysia was a scam ab initio… That is the reality..since the Proclamation of Malaysia..on 16 September, 1963, a departure from what had been observed and done since Malaysia was announced by Tunku Abdul Rahman since early 1962. We had the 18/20 points of Sarawak and Sabah now in the “dustbin” of the conqueror not equal partners. We had the Cobbold Commission and IGC Report which had been sidelined by the conqueror. What some rapists are saying is that Parliament can change the MA63 and the original intention thereof by amending whatever abuses of the conqueror could do like now rapists are marrying the very young victims after raping with or without consent. The International Agreement aka Malaysia Agreement 1963 signed by 5 parties on 9th July, 1963 and the 5 parties were UK, Malaya, Singapore, Sabah and Sarawak especially when Sabah and Sarawak lacks legal standing to sign the said agreement as British Colonies. What are the views of the legally uneven yoked partners? The reality as diluted is Malaysia is 5, 4 or 13 or 14, 15 partners expanded by fanciful desires of the conqueror? Look at how any Agreement is made especially MA63 when 5 parties were fully involved. Did Tunku represent Malaya as a solitary body or did he represent 11 other states of Malaya? Was he empowered to negotiate for 11 states of Malaya? Where is the consent document from all the 11 States? Why Kelantan objected to Malaysia on 11 September, 1963? Did that objection divert the mind of Tunku in his original intention of Malaysia of 5, 4 or 3? What did Tunku say in 1962? So the reality of any Agreement in any partnership is that all the partners should come together in any meeting but no so in Malaysia Agreement 63. Whatever documents including Parliament amendment especially in 1976 are all after thought of the conqueror making Malaysia a scam ab initio. So we must now deal with this deformity of Malaysia and resolve or dissolve it in the most appropriate manner without fail. IGGG M is the beginning of the fresh effort of fresh air in this tragedy. Joshua Kong, PM of IGGG M. On 11 September 1963, just 4 days before the new Federation of Malaysia was to come into being, the Government of the State of Kelantan sought a declaration that the Malaysia Agreement and Malaysia Act were nulfive parties l and void, or alternatively, that even if they were valid, they did not bind the State of Kelantan. The Kelantan Government argued that both the Malaysia Agreement and the Malaysia Act were not binding on Kelantan on the following grounds that the Malaysia Act in effect abolished the Federation of Malaya and this was contrary to the 1957 Federation of Malaya Agreement that the proposed changes required the consent of each of the constituent states of the Federation of Malaya – including Kelantan – and this had not been obtained. Proclamation of Malaysia (start of PoM) WHEREAS by an Agreement made on the Ninth day of July in the year one thousand nine hundred and sixty-three between the Federation of Malaya, the United Kingdom, North Borneo, Sarawak and Singapore it was agreed that there shall be federated the States of Sabah, Sarawak and Singapore with the Federation of Malaya comprising the states of Pahang, Trengganu, Kedah, Johore, Negri Sembilan, Kelantan, Selangor, Perak, Perlis, Penang and Malacca, and that the Federation shall thereafter be called "MALAYSIA": (end of PoM) MALAYSIA comprising the States of Pahang, Trengganu, Kedah, Johore, Negri Sembilan, Kelantan, Selangor, Perak, Perlis, Penang, Malacca, Singapore, Sabah and Sarawak shall by the Grace of God, the Lord of the Universe, forever be an independent and sovereign democratic State founded upon liberty and justice, ever seeking to defend and uphold peace and harmony among its people and to perpetuate peace among nations. Any hidden agenda??